Skip to main content

Response to "Trump: America's Last President?" by Lily Wobbe

Response to "Trump: America's Last President?" by Lily Wobbe

The U.S. will not be a fascist dictatorship anytime in the foreseeable future, good job, go team! I agree with this premise expressed in "Trump: America's Last President?" on Lily Wobbe's blog "Fakes vs Facts", but I must respectfully disagree on some key points made in the post. Let's start off by stating that I do not believe Trump will be America's last president. I don't understand how someone could think that. However, it seems to me that Trumpism and its rhetoric is a clear sign of the decline of western democracy, whether a symptom or a cause. 

Lily states that "(Trump) is not "destroying democracy" like some people argue", but I would have to say he, slowly but surely, absolutely is. Trump's reckless and callous disregard for the fine balance of institutions that keep our nation running is dangerous to democracy at the very least. The most blatantly obvious example of this from the J&C wing would be his countless assaults on the free press. Even though the American people may be desensitized to it now as this absurdity has become routine, the current President of the United States of America has repeatedly called the media "the enemy of the people". I shouldn't need to tell anyone reading why that is a textbook definition of destroying democracy. Trump lost the popular vote by over three million votes, but he denies this fact and falsely claims he won if you don't count illegal votes. Our president's campaign had a meeting with representatives of a hostile foreign government seeking to influence the race for president and interfere with the democratic process. These are just a few examples of a plethora that could be called upon to show how Trump has fueled the degradation of democracy as we know it. I would love for someone to show me exactly how this hasn't weakened our republic, but unfortunately, I doubt that anyone can.
           
Of Lawrence Britt's Fourteen Defining Characteristics of Fascism, each and every one is present in the U.S. today. By my count, Trump has worsened every last one of those symptoms. Certainly, we can all agree that Trump has brought a heightened sense of nationalism, protected corporate power and given the military a "disproportionate amount of government funding" despite "widespread domestic problems" Lily points out that Trump only has a little over two years left. She makes it sound like he couldn't feasibly have a second term, but it is quite possible he has six years and four months left. Anyway, I don't mean to sound alarmist, but I do mean what I write. We have checks and balances, but our system isn't foolproof. Our systems and institutions take time to decay, but they will without proper care. Nazi Germany wasn't built in a day, a foundation of hatred had to slowly be built up first before the seemingly sturdy Weimar Republic could be torn down. It could happen here. Trump certainly isn't Hitler, his supporters absolutely are not nazis. No, Trump will not be the last president. However, many of his actions are a potent threat to our as of yet unfailing democracy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly A Response to Isabella Bonilla's  "A Reflection Of the Past 72 Hours" The past few weeks, months and years have looked bleak for the grand arc of human triumph over tribalism. From Brexit to Bolsonaro, rifts between groups of people have become evident if not enlarged.  Isabella responded to  a class discussion on hate crimes committed in recent days with an eloquently worded piece. (Yes I realise I have already responded to one of Isabella's posts, but they are thoughtful and not too many posts for this continuation have been made yet). In it she makes many points about the media's role in covering a tragedy. She also points out that the internet, the modern marvel it is, has a rampant problem with disinformation and promoting radicalizing echo chambers. I agree in many regards that the internet and social media are not beneficial to the state of public discourse. I don't have any social media because I

In Defense of WDRB

In Defense of WDRB Local news is inherently flawed. Local news is often incapable of living up to national expectations on a low budget and local audience. Evie published a post  that had some harsh words for WDRB today. In it, she berates the local news station for airing too many stories about social issues or human interest, and for publishing too many sports stories online. The way she sees it, WDRB sacrifices being able to do in depth coverage on specific stories in exchange for more time for populist stories. While I agree with her in some points, I fundamentally disagree with her opinions on what constitutes a relevant and important story.  Evie states that on a recent broadcast "there were nine stories that fit under the category of social issues and human interests, but their were zero stories on politics and government, and only one story on accidents and disasters" to support her point that WDRB is airing too many irrelevant stories. While I do see it as s

All the Facts

All the Facts On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported.  Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why