Skip to main content

Response to "Consumption of Communication" by Isabella Bonilla

A Response to "Consumption of Mass Communication"

Earlier today I had the pleasure of reading "Consumption of Mass Communication" on Isabella Bonilla's blog "Belladora: Critique This". Isabella makes some good points I agree with in the post. She points out that "The refusal to have exposure to opposing views creates ignorance within our reality" , and I couldn't agree more. Through out the post, she has a point that I agree with and she certainly doesn't mince her well chosen words. Isabella does make one point that I disagree with. In the final paragraph of her post she says that "(The psychological filter) can be changed at simple will, and pushed curiosity of the mind." I do not believe that the psychological filter can be easily removed, on the contrary I think that it takes extreme persistence and a changed state of mind. 

I will be the first to admit, I have a psychological filter. Perhaps mine isn't as extreme as some, but I am aware that it exists. I certainly don't take pride in it, and I have worked on suppressing it by getting news from many sources from the left and right. Psychological filters are ingrained in those in us. They are learned and it is no walk in the park to unlearn them. Psychological filters can become part of people's very identities and senses of self. Giving up a part of you in this situation is necessary for the well-being of the world, but it is impossible to see the lies when you are caught up in them. That takes a long, hard, deep look into yourself. 

 Of course, it is easier to take that long, hard look than it is to take a look at a newspaper if you are blind. The physical filter is more often than not impossible to remove. The informational filter only involves acquiring new information so you can interpret a message, be that learning a new language or just a few new facts. I will wrap back around by agreeing with Isabella again. She says that changing the psychological filter is "...like the boss battle at the end of the game. If you want to overcome the psychological filter, you have to fight yourself." I couldn't say it better, so I won't try. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly A Response to Isabella Bonilla's  "A Reflection Of the Past 72 Hours" The past few weeks, months and years have looked bleak for the grand arc of human triumph over tribalism. From Brexit to Bolsonaro, rifts between groups of people have become evident if not enlarged.  Isabella responded to  a class discussion on hate crimes committed in recent days with an eloquently worded piece. (Yes I realise I have already responded to one of Isabella's posts, but they are thoughtful and not too many posts for this continuation have been made yet). In it she makes many points about the media's role in covering a tragedy. She also points out that the internet, the modern marvel it is, has a rampant problem with disinformation and promoting radicalizing echo chambers. I agree in many regards that the internet and social media are not beneficial to the state of public discourse. I don't have any social media because I
1 comment
Read more

In Defense of WDRB

In Defense of WDRB Local news is inherently flawed. Local news is often incapable of living up to national expectations on a low budget and local audience. Evie published a post  that had some harsh words for WDRB today. In it, she berates the local news station for airing too many stories about social issues or human interest, and for publishing too many sports stories online. The way she sees it, WDRB sacrifices being able to do in depth coverage on specific stories in exchange for more time for populist stories. While I agree with her in some points, I fundamentally disagree with her opinions on what constitutes a relevant and important story.  Evie states that on a recent broadcast "there were nine stories that fit under the category of social issues and human interests, but their were zero stories on politics and government, and only one story on accidents and disasters" to support her point that WDRB is airing too many irrelevant stories. While I do see it as s
1 comment
Read more

All the Facts

All the Facts On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported.  Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why
Post a Comment
Read more