Skip to main content

Response to "Consumption of Communication" by Isabella Bonilla

A Response to "Consumption of Mass Communication"

Earlier today I had the pleasure of reading "Consumption of Mass Communication" on Isabella Bonilla's blog "Belladora: Critique This". Isabella makes some good points I agree with in the post. She points out that "The refusal to have exposure to opposing views creates ignorance within our reality" , and I couldn't agree more. Through out the post, she has a point that I agree with and she certainly doesn't mince her well chosen words. Isabella does make one point that I disagree with. In the final paragraph of her post she says that "(The psychological filter) can be changed at simple will, and pushed curiosity of the mind." I do not believe that the psychological filter can be easily removed, on the contrary I think that it takes extreme persistence and a changed state of mind. 

I will be the first to admit, I have a psychological filter. Perhaps mine isn't as extreme as some, but I am aware that it exists. I certainly don't take pride in it, and I have worked on suppressing it by getting news from many sources from the left and right. Psychological filters are ingrained in those in us. They are learned and it is no walk in the park to unlearn them. Psychological filters can become part of people's very identities and senses of self. Giving up a part of you in this situation is necessary for the well-being of the world, but it is impossible to see the lies when you are caught up in them. That takes a long, hard, deep look into yourself. 

 Of course, it is easier to take that long, hard look than it is to take a look at a newspaper if you are blind. The physical filter is more often than not impossible to remove. The informational filter only involves acquiring new information so you can interpret a message, be that learning a new language or just a few new facts. I will wrap back around by agreeing with Isabella again. She says that changing the psychological filter is "...like the boss battle at the end of the game. If you want to overcome the psychological filter, you have to fight yourself." I couldn't say it better, so I won't try. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Not with a Bang but a Trickle

Not with a Bang but a Trickle The history of mass communication has inevitably become intertwined with the history of technology at large. When learning the history our lessons usually start with the advent of a new invention. Lessons have started with the metal moveable type printing press, the phonograph, and the camera. On the surface, the picture some lectures paint is that history has hinged on critical individuals and that broader social phenomenon have been propagated by the "great men" of history. This posit is based on discussions from multiple classes, but the idea came back me because of the discussions about music and sound recording technologies.  I have multiple problems with the aforementioned implications of some lectures. When our class learned about music, it all started with Thomas Edison. We learned about his phonograph, and Berliner's gramophone and then all of modern musical history as if these late 19th century inventions kickstarted an imm...
Post a Comment
Read more

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly A Response to Isabella Bonilla's  "A Reflection Of the Past 72 Hours" The past few weeks, months and years have looked bleak for the grand arc of human triumph over tribalism. From Brexit to Bolsonaro, rifts between groups of people have become evident if not enlarged.  Isabella responded to  a class discussion on hate crimes committed in recent days with an eloquently worded piece. (Yes I realise I have already responded to one of Isabella's posts, but they are thoughtful and not too many posts for this continuation have been made yet). In it she makes many points about the media's role in covering a tragedy. She also points out that the internet, the modern marvel it is, has a rampant problem with disinformation and promoting radicalizing echo chambers. I agree in many regards that the internet and social media are not beneficial to the state of public discourse. I don't have any social media because I ...
1 comment
Read more

Yellow Journalism and Democracy (Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class)

Yellow Journalism and Democracy Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class Why does fake news exist? I have briefly dabbled into the topic of fake news in previous posts, but today seems like the perfect time to do a deeper dive as we talked about yellow journalism in class on Wednesday. More specifically, what happens when a news organization is willing to compromise its integrity, truth, and loyalty to the people in order to sell papers or today, ads. This year's J+C freshman class has had it drilled into our minds from day one that a journalist's first loyalty is always to the people, and for good reason. The original era of yellow journalism was born from a natural and capitalist desire of corporations to make money, and from the public's desire to be entertained. In class my classmates and I learned about yellow journalism in the context of Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, not Rupert Murdoch or Ted Turner. But woul...
Post a Comment
Read more