Skip to main content

A General Review of WDRB

A General Review of WDRB


From my time watching WDRB while doing this blog, I have mixed reviews. It isn't perfect and doesn't strictly adhere to the somewhat utopian yardsticks and guidelines, but most of its stories are relevant and from looking at the early data our class has gathered, it appears to be the best local news station we've got.

WDRB has a fair mixture of populist and elitist stories. The ever-chastised sports stories are limited to only about three short stories at the last three to four minutes of each half-hour broadcast. While crime stories are sometimes a large part of the show, there are usually important stories mixed in. WDRB always has two weather stories per broadcast, which seems a reasonable number considering that weather directly affects the lives of every viewer, but time is very limited in a thirty minute broadcast with ten or so minutes of ads. I've been impressed by many of WDRB's stories on social issues and government programs such as a story about how an agency tasked with fixing ugly houses isn't doing its job and one on how a program to help homeless foster kids has become extremely underfunded as the number of homeless children in Kentucky has spiked. These stories show how WDRB also has a fair balance between being a watchdog and reporting when agencies aren't doing their jobs, and also fairly reporting when those agencies are incapable of achieving their objectives. WDRB has some good reporting, but it isn't all ideal.

While primarily focusing on local stories can helps keep the stories relevant to local viewers, WDRB has almost exclusively local stories. While we have watched there have been a grand total of zero international stories. There have only been six national stories, many of which have been national in only the most technical of senses, taking place in Indianapolis, Lexington or other parts of Kentucky. Surely there would have been more than zero stories from our wide world more relevant than "Triple A does a free battery check" or "An unknown incident took place in a Newburg apartment building". In a time period in which Jamal Khasshogi was killed, Brazil elected a new president and Angela Merkel announced that she wouldn't run for the German chancellorship again, at least one story from the wide world should have made the cut. I have already detailed my many problems with one incomplete lead story WDRB aired, but that very poor story has thankfully been an outlier.

If I had to choose, I would give WDRB four stars out of five. There is room for improvement with the lack of national and international stories, but most stories aired are relevant and many are investigative and of a high standard or journalism. I can't speak for WDRB's competition, but from my experience watching other local news it is bad. Other local stations have broadcasts dominated by sports and crime stories, unlike WDRB. WDRB isn't the perfect local news station, but it is the best Kentuckiana currently has.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yellow Journalism and Democracy (Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class)

Yellow Journalism and Democracy Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class Why does fake news exist? I have briefly dabbled into the topic of fake news in previous posts, but today seems like the perfect time to do a deeper dive as we talked about yellow journalism in class on Wednesday. More specifically, what happens when a news organization is willing to compromise its integrity, truth, and loyalty to the people in order to sell papers or today, ads. This year's J+C freshman class has had it drilled into our minds from day one that a journalist's first loyalty is always to the people, and for good reason. The original era of yellow journalism was born from a natural and capitalist desire of corporations to make money, and from the public's desire to be entertained. In class my classmates and I learned about yellow journalism in the context of Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, not Rupert Murdoch or Ted Turner. But woul...

Response to "Consumption of Communication" by Isabella Bonilla

A Response to "Consumption of Mass Communication" Earlier today I had the pleasure of reading " Consumption of Mass Communication " on Isabella Bonilla's blog  "Belladora: Critique This" . Isabella makes some good points I agree with in the post. She points out that "The refusal to have exposure to opposing views creates ignorance within our reality" , and I couldn't agree more. Through out the post, she has a point that I agree with and she certainly doesn't mince her well chosen words. Isabella does make one point that I disagree with. In the final paragraph of her post she says that "(The psychological filter) can be changed at simple will, and pushed curiosity of the mind." I do not believe that the psychological filter can be easily removed, on the contrary I think that it takes extreme persistence and a changed state of mind.  I will be the first to admit, I have a psychological filter. Perhaps mine isn't as...