Skip to main content

All the Facts

All the Facts
On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported. 

Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why air it with no details on the first place? 

This story quite clearly should have violated many of the yardsticks of journalism, but it is so empty that it is hard to pin down. Can't say anything that violates the yardsticks of journalism if you don't actually say anything! You could say this story did blatantly disregard fairness because it got no sides of the story. The story was completely un-newsworthy as there was no details. The fact that there was a disturbance of the peace certainly does not affect a lot of people for a long time. There were no discernable sources as the reporters literally didn't know what was happening. Watching this "story" was not a good use of anyone's time. 

Explaining why thus story shouldn't have been aired when it was takes no great manifesto. It is pretty self explanatory that a story shouldn't be published or aired until there are enough confirmed details that some story can be made. The Onion once published a story much like the one aired first on WDRB's 6 P.M. broadcast on the 15th. Come on, is it too much to ask for our local news organizations to have higher journalistic standards than The Onion? The Onion mocks the worst of the news organizations of the 21st century and satirizes what they have become. Based on watching WDRB, it seems their parodies are all too accurate. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Yellow Journalism and Democracy (Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class)

Yellow Journalism and Democracy Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class Why does fake news exist? I have briefly dabbled into the topic of fake news in previous posts, but today seems like the perfect time to do a deeper dive as we talked about yellow journalism in class on Wednesday. More specifically, what happens when a news organization is willing to compromise its integrity, truth, and loyalty to the people in order to sell papers or today, ads. This year's J+C freshman class has had it drilled into our minds from day one that a journalist's first loyalty is always to the people, and for good reason. The original era of yellow journalism was born from a natural and capitalist desire of corporations to make money, and from the public's desire to be entertained. In class my classmates and I learned about yellow journalism in the context of Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, not Rupert Murdoch or Ted Turner. But woul...
Post a Comment
Read more

Response to "Consumption of Communication" by Isabella Bonilla

A Response to "Consumption of Mass Communication" Earlier today I had the pleasure of reading " Consumption of Mass Communication " on Isabella Bonilla's blog  "Belladora: Critique This" . Isabella makes some good points I agree with in the post. She points out that "The refusal to have exposure to opposing views creates ignorance within our reality" , and I couldn't agree more. Through out the post, she has a point that I agree with and she certainly doesn't mince her well chosen words. Isabella does make one point that I disagree with. In the final paragraph of her post she says that "(The psychological filter) can be changed at simple will, and pushed curiosity of the mind." I do not believe that the psychological filter can be easily removed, on the contrary I think that it takes extreme persistence and a changed state of mind.  I will be the first to admit, I have a psychological filter. Perhaps mine isn't as...
Post a Comment
Read more

A General Review of WDRB

A General Review of WDRB From my time watching WDRB while doing this blog, I have mixed reviews. It isn't perfect and doesn't strictly adhere to the somewhat utopian yardsticks and guidelines, but most of its stories are relevant and from looking at the early data our class has gathered, it appears to be the best local news station we've got. WDRB has a fair mixture of populist and elitist stories. The ever-chastised sports stories are limited to only about three short stories at the last three to four minutes of each half-hour broadcast. While crime stories are sometimes a large part of the show, there are usually important stories mixed in. WDRB always has two weather stories per broadcast, which seems a reasonable number considering that weather directly affects the lives of every viewer, but time is very limited in a thirty minute broadcast with ten or so minutes of ads. I've been impressed by many of WDRB's stories on social issues and government program...
Post a Comment
Read more