Skip to main content

Technological Advancement: Then versus Now

Technological Advancement: Then versus Now

In my last response to what we discussed in class I took our learning about the present day and connected it to the past. In this one I plan to do quite the opposite. Today we discussed the advance of printing technology, particularly the invention and popularization of the printing press. This great leap forward provided lots of information previously reserved for the elite to a huge amount of the populous. Recently, we experienced a similar change in how information is distributed leading to an explosion in the amount of information readily available to a wide segment of the populous. But this new phenomenon called the internet has also exponentially increased the amount of something quite the opposite, disinformation, or "fake news". This new great leap is an innovation, but should it be a welcome one? 

In class, we talked about how the metal printing press allowed for a vast increase in the availability of information for everyday people. This new technology made bibles affordable for a greater slice of the European populous, let many more people acquire quality educations and it dispelled myths and rumors while propelling humanity into a scientific age. This internet has given billions instant access to most all information ever known by anyone. It is undoubtedly a tool that can and has been harnessed for the greater good, but it seems most of us are misusing it. The dawn of the internet has brought easier access to and greater use of many materials that can be used to enrich the mind, but it hasn't overseen the type of massive overhaul in the knowledge of everyday people as the printing press. Now, much of that is probably due to the fact that such a large percentage of the world's children do go to schools, so there wasn't as much need or potential to expand literacy or overall knowledge. None of this is to negate the change the internet has brought to society that is surely unfathomable to my peers and me, who have never known an unconnected world. This newest technological revolution still happening around us today may be used in a more populist than elitist manner. While that certainly has improved humanities access to entertainment, perhaps our quality of life would be better enhanced by more educational use of this fabulous tool. If you are reading this, you have the world at your fingertips. Go out and explore!  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly A Response to Isabella Bonilla's  "A Reflection Of the Past 72 Hours" The past few weeks, months and years have looked bleak for the grand arc of human triumph over tribalism. From Brexit to Bolsonaro, rifts between groups of people have become evident if not enlarged.  Isabella responded to  a class discussion on hate crimes committed in recent days with an eloquently worded piece. (Yes I realise I have already responded to one of Isabella's posts, but they are thoughtful and not too many posts for this continuation have been made yet). In it she makes many points about the media's role in covering a tragedy. She also points out that the internet, the modern marvel it is, has a rampant problem with disinformation and promoting radicalizing echo chambers. I agree in many regards that the internet and social media are not beneficial to the state of public discourse. I don't have any social media because I

In Defense of WDRB

In Defense of WDRB Local news is inherently flawed. Local news is often incapable of living up to national expectations on a low budget and local audience. Evie published a post  that had some harsh words for WDRB today. In it, she berates the local news station for airing too many stories about social issues or human interest, and for publishing too many sports stories online. The way she sees it, WDRB sacrifices being able to do in depth coverage on specific stories in exchange for more time for populist stories. While I agree with her in some points, I fundamentally disagree with her opinions on what constitutes a relevant and important story.  Evie states that on a recent broadcast "there were nine stories that fit under the category of social issues and human interests, but their were zero stories on politics and government, and only one story on accidents and disasters" to support her point that WDRB is airing too many irrelevant stories. While I do see it as s

All the Facts

All the Facts On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported.  Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why