Skip to main content

Technological Advancement: Then versus Now

Technological Advancement: Then versus Now

In my last response to what we discussed in class I took our learning about the present day and connected it to the past. In this one I plan to do quite the opposite. Today we discussed the advance of printing technology, particularly the invention and popularization of the printing press. This great leap forward provided lots of information previously reserved for the elite to a huge amount of the populous. Recently, we experienced a similar change in how information is distributed leading to an explosion in the amount of information readily available to a wide segment of the populous. But this new phenomenon called the internet has also exponentially increased the amount of something quite the opposite, disinformation, or "fake news". This new great leap is an innovation, but should it be a welcome one? 

In class, we talked about how the metal printing press allowed for a vast increase in the availability of information for everyday people. This new technology made bibles affordable for a greater slice of the European populous, let many more people acquire quality educations and it dispelled myths and rumors while propelling humanity into a scientific age. This internet has given billions instant access to most all information ever known by anyone. It is undoubtedly a tool that can and has been harnessed for the greater good, but it seems most of us are misusing it. The dawn of the internet has brought easier access to and greater use of many materials that can be used to enrich the mind, but it hasn't overseen the type of massive overhaul in the knowledge of everyday people as the printing press. Now, much of that is probably due to the fact that such a large percentage of the world's children do go to schools, so there wasn't as much need or potential to expand literacy or overall knowledge. None of this is to negate the change the internet has brought to society that is surely unfathomable to my peers and me, who have never known an unconnected world. This newest technological revolution still happening around us today may be used in a more populist than elitist manner. While that certainly has improved humanities access to entertainment, perhaps our quality of life would be better enhanced by more educational use of this fabulous tool. If you are reading this, you have the world at your fingertips. Go out and explore!  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yellow Journalism and Democracy (Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class)

Yellow Journalism and Democracy Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class Why does fake news exist? I have briefly dabbled into the topic of fake news in previous posts, but today seems like the perfect time to do a deeper dive as we talked about yellow journalism in class on Wednesday. More specifically, what happens when a news organization is willing to compromise its integrity, truth, and loyalty to the people in order to sell papers or today, ads. This year's J+C freshman class has had it drilled into our minds from day one that a journalist's first loyalty is always to the people, and for good reason. The original era of yellow journalism was born from a natural and capitalist desire of corporations to make money, and from the public's desire to be entertained. In class my classmates and I learned about yellow journalism in the context of Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, not Rupert Murdoch or Ted Turner. But woul...

Response to "Consumption of Communication" by Isabella Bonilla

A Response to "Consumption of Mass Communication" Earlier today I had the pleasure of reading " Consumption of Mass Communication " on Isabella Bonilla's blog  "Belladora: Critique This" . Isabella makes some good points I agree with in the post. She points out that "The refusal to have exposure to opposing views creates ignorance within our reality" , and I couldn't agree more. Through out the post, she has a point that I agree with and she certainly doesn't mince her well chosen words. Isabella does make one point that I disagree with. In the final paragraph of her post she says that "(The psychological filter) can be changed at simple will, and pushed curiosity of the mind." I do not believe that the psychological filter can be easily removed, on the contrary I think that it takes extreme persistence and a changed state of mind.  I will be the first to admit, I have a psychological filter. Perhaps mine isn't as...

Popcorn: There for the Crowds or the Cash?

Popcorn: There for the Crowds or the Cash? A Response to "Movie Theater Immersion" Marjorie made a post  about how she believes that food common at movie theaters is part of the immersive experience that draws people to the theaters today. While I agree on some points she makes, I would largely disagree in this more lighthearted dispute.  In her post, Marjorie acknowledges that one can get many movie theater snacks at home. She counters that you just can't get the same experience from snacks at home. While it is true that you can't get the exact recipe of popcorn at home, you also have many more options at home. You can go to the grocery and get whatever type of snack you want, whereas you are limited to a select few options at the theater.  The immersive experience of a movie theater refers to how one feels surrounded by a movie and focuses his or her attention exclusively on the film. Snacks do the opposite of that by focusing attention on taste and...