Skip to main content

Technological Advancement: Then versus Now

Technological Advancement: Then versus Now

In my last response to what we discussed in class I took our learning about the present day and connected it to the past. In this one I plan to do quite the opposite. Today we discussed the advance of printing technology, particularly the invention and popularization of the printing press. This great leap forward provided lots of information previously reserved for the elite to a huge amount of the populous. Recently, we experienced a similar change in how information is distributed leading to an explosion in the amount of information readily available to a wide segment of the populous. But this new phenomenon called the internet has also exponentially increased the amount of something quite the opposite, disinformation, or "fake news". This new great leap is an innovation, but should it be a welcome one? 

In class, we talked about how the metal printing press allowed for a vast increase in the availability of information for everyday people. This new technology made bibles affordable for a greater slice of the European populous, let many more people acquire quality educations and it dispelled myths and rumors while propelling humanity into a scientific age. This internet has given billions instant access to most all information ever known by anyone. It is undoubtedly a tool that can and has been harnessed for the greater good, but it seems most of us are misusing it. The dawn of the internet has brought easier access to and greater use of many materials that can be used to enrich the mind, but it hasn't overseen the type of massive overhaul in the knowledge of everyday people as the printing press. Now, much of that is probably due to the fact that such a large percentage of the world's children do go to schools, so there wasn't as much need or potential to expand literacy or overall knowledge. None of this is to negate the change the internet has brought to society that is surely unfathomable to my peers and me, who have never known an unconnected world. This newest technological revolution still happening around us today may be used in a more populist than elitist manner. While that certainly has improved humanities access to entertainment, perhaps our quality of life would be better enhanced by more educational use of this fabulous tool. If you are reading this, you have the world at your fingertips. Go out and explore!  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart A response to a class discussion on recent hate crimes   Hate is not the thing with feathers.  It is not natural, it is not innate to anyone. It is learned, which is what is most frightening about the three heinous hate crimes that rocked the U.S. in the past three days. In our own hometown a man shot and killed two black people at a Kroger in a racially motivated attack. The man that mailed pipe bombs in an attempt to assassinate a former president, a presidential nominee, a former attorney general, a billionaire and members of a news organization was captured. A man shot and killed eleven Jews in a synagogue.  Many have come to the consensus over the past three days of hatred and gradually over the past couple of years that some newfound hatred is gripping America. It can certainly feel that way. There is evidence that hate crimes are on the rise. That is startling. Not to copy Franklin Roosevelt, but the scariest thing from this m...

Not with a Bang but a Trickle

Not with a Bang but a Trickle The history of mass communication has inevitably become intertwined with the history of technology at large. When learning the history our lessons usually start with the advent of a new invention. Lessons have started with the metal moveable type printing press, the phonograph, and the camera. On the surface, the picture some lectures paint is that history has hinged on critical individuals and that broader social phenomenon have been propagated by the "great men" of history. This posit is based on discussions from multiple classes, but the idea came back me because of the discussions about music and sound recording technologies.  I have multiple problems with the aforementioned implications of some lectures. When our class learned about music, it all started with Thomas Edison. We learned about his phonograph, and Berliner's gramophone and then all of modern musical history as if these late 19th century inventions kickstarted an imm...

All the Facts

All the Facts On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported.  Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why...