Skip to main content

A Shameful Display of Journalism (News Media Critique)

A Shameful Display of Journalism

 On September 16th local news site WHAS11 published an article titled "Man injured in Jennings County hit-and-run; police searching for vehicle" that utterly fails to adhere to some of the most basic principles that constitute quality journalism. The article certainly is not an outlier among countless other similar stories, but it represents a long trend of local news organizations giving up potential shots at being recognized as esteemed institutions in exchange for lackluster and meaningless reporting that, nonetheless, gathers ad revenue. There are many yardsticks and elements of journalism that this article does not even attempt to meet. This article would certainly be a dent in the reputation of any organization really striving to be seen as a good news source.

To start off, this article is not newsworthy. To be deemed newsworthy, an article must be about an event that will have a "lasting effect on a lot of people". One hit-and-run will certainly have a lasting impact on a few people. It will have a large and lasting impact on the victim, his or her family and acquaintances and the perpetrator and his or her family and acquaintances. This small group of people certainly would not be considered "a lot of people". The article and countless others with a near identical premise published on WHAS11's website and other local news sites are not newsworthy.

The article "Man injured in Jennings County hit-and-run; police searching for vehicle" does not just fall short on meeting one yardstick of journalism. The yardstick of context is also clearly not met. The article repeatedly repeats what reporters heard from police. The police seem to be the only source contacted for information about the crime. There are no eyewitness accounts (Granted, there may be none as the event occured before five in the morning) or evident attempts to dig deeper than what anyone could easily figure from asking a singular source. The only evident evidence of a source other than the Jennings County Police Department being contacted is the fact that the article says the man hit in the hit-and-run was admitted to University Hospital, "where he is listed in critical condition".

The journalists behind this shameful misrepresentation of true reporting could do nothing about the fact that the article is not newsworthy. There really isn't a story in what they were reporting on, so the authors, only named "WHAS11 Staff" in the article, simply should not have researched or published the article. The article's complete lack of context (sources), on the other hand, could have been improved. The reporter(s) working on the story could have asked people that live near by if they heard or saw anything. The reporters could have asked the hospital more specifically how the man was injured. They could have not published the story until more details could be acquired, such as who the driver that hit the man was and a more detailed status of the victim. WHAS11 needs to better uphold the standards of good journalism for the benefit not just of their news organization, but for that of the community.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart A response to a class discussion on recent hate crimes   Hate is not the thing with feathers.  It is not natural, it is not innate to anyone. It is learned, which is what is most frightening about the three heinous hate crimes that rocked the U.S. in the past three days. In our own hometown a man shot and killed two black people at a Kroger in a racially motivated attack. The man that mailed pipe bombs in an attempt to assassinate a former president, a presidential nominee, a former attorney general, a billionaire and members of a news organization was captured. A man shot and killed eleven Jews in a synagogue.  Many have come to the consensus over the past three days of hatred and gradually over the past couple of years that some newfound hatred is gripping America. It can certainly feel that way. There is evidence that hate crimes are on the rise. That is startling. Not to copy Franklin Roosevelt, but the scariest thing from this m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Not with a Bang but a Trickle

Not with a Bang but a Trickle The history of mass communication has inevitably become intertwined with the history of technology at large. When learning the history our lessons usually start with the advent of a new invention. Lessons have started with the metal moveable type printing press, the phonograph, and the camera. On the surface, the picture some lectures paint is that history has hinged on critical individuals and that broader social phenomenon have been propagated by the "great men" of history. This posit is based on discussions from multiple classes, but the idea came back me because of the discussions about music and sound recording technologies.  I have multiple problems with the aforementioned implications of some lectures. When our class learned about music, it all started with Thomas Edison. We learned about his phonograph, and Berliner's gramophone and then all of modern musical history as if these late 19th century inventions kickstarted an imm...
Post a Comment
Read more

All the Facts

All the Facts On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported.  Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why...
Post a Comment
Read more