Skip to main content

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly

We Forward in this Generation

Triumphantly

A Response to Isabella Bonilla's 
"A Reflection Of the Past 72 Hours"

The past few weeks, months and years have looked bleak for the grand arc of human triumph over tribalism. From Brexit to Bolsonaro, rifts between groups of people have become evident if not enlarged. Isabella responded to a class discussion on hate crimes committed in recent days with an eloquently worded piece. (Yes I realise I have already responded to one of Isabella's posts, but they are thoughtful and not too many posts for this continuation have been made yet). In it she makes many points about the media's role in covering a tragedy. She also points out that the internet, the modern marvel it is, has a rampant problem with disinformation and promoting radicalizing echo chambers.

I agree in many regards that the internet and social media are not beneficial to the state of public discourse. I don't have any social media because I think it would be bad for my mental health, but I can imagine that scrolling through a feed of ideas you already agree with can force you further and further away from seeing the legitimacy in an opposing argument. But the internet can be used for good. The way it is now used seems to be the opposite of the intended goal. A technology meant to promote communication between different people with different ideas has instead become a self sorting algorithm that radicalizes those originally most prone to hearing arguments and changing opinions. But the internet can be and is being used in a better way. The internet has literally just about everything one could possibly know. News websites are newspapers that are constantly updated, e-mail allows us to instantly communicate with those half a world away, google is basically a genie that can tell you whatever you want to know.(and also spies on you, but you know, life is a double edged sword.) The internet has raised countless amounts of money for charities, it has public debate forums, it has it all. It is hard for us 21st century kids to imagine life without it.

Isabella also expressed that the media was largely at fault for the divisiveness of today's society. While there is no scientific method for measuring societal divisiveness, the media sure likes to promote the narrative that America is more divided than ever and that we are at the precipice of some civil war because of it. Divided is a pretty vague term, though. Isabella places much of the blame for today's political and social climate on the media promoting their own viewpoints instead of objectively covering the most newsworthy stories. She lists many seemingly at odds groups and says that "The majority of one group hates the other, and vice-versa." While I agree that racial, political and other disputes are now often too connected to identity, I sure wouldn't go as far as to say that the majority of white people hate black people or black people hate white people, because that just isn't true. I think to say that is to accept the ultimate lie pushed and propagated by some of the media, that being that most Americans hate each other. Constant stories about crime make it seem more prevalent than it is, and an abundance of stories on racism and hatred make it seem more widespread than it is. People have subconscious biases for sure, there is still everyday racism and one person calling the cops on a black person for going about their life in a completely normal manner isn't acceptable. However, most white Americans don't think their race is superior, aren't in the klan and don't hate others based on the color of their skin.

We sure don't live in a post-racial world as was suggested ten years ago from Tuesday. Racism, sexism, bigotry and general hate are still major problems in the U.S. We don't live in a perfect world or country. But we also don't live in a world where most straight people hate gay people or most democrats hate republicans. The most recent poll on the subject found that two-thirds of Americans support same-sex marriage. Another poll found that sixty-eight percent of Americans think openness to people from other nations is critical to who we are as a country. The grandest project of America is to have every group of human beings able to live here together and side by side in peace and harmony. As evidenced by this week of hatred, we sure aren't there yet. But if the majority of Americans share that view of our country, just maybe we aren't as far as we think.

Comments

  1. Thank you for the constructive criticism on my post. I have made a few small edits in order to adapt to this new information. I really appreciate it, and am always looking to be further educated on topics. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Yellow Journalism and Democracy (Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class)

Yellow Journalism and Democracy Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class Why does fake news exist? I have briefly dabbled into the topic of fake news in previous posts, but today seems like the perfect time to do a deeper dive as we talked about yellow journalism in class on Wednesday. More specifically, what happens when a news organization is willing to compromise its integrity, truth, and loyalty to the people in order to sell papers or today, ads. This year's J+C freshman class has had it drilled into our minds from day one that a journalist's first loyalty is always to the people, and for good reason. The original era of yellow journalism was born from a natural and capitalist desire of corporations to make money, and from the public's desire to be entertained. In class my classmates and I learned about yellow journalism in the context of Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, not Rupert Murdoch or Ted Turner. But woul...

Popcorn: There for the Crowds or the Cash?

Popcorn: There for the Crowds or the Cash? A Response to "Movie Theater Immersion" Marjorie made a post  about how she believes that food common at movie theaters is part of the immersive experience that draws people to the theaters today. While I agree on some points she makes, I would largely disagree in this more lighthearted dispute.  In her post, Marjorie acknowledges that one can get many movie theater snacks at home. She counters that you just can't get the same experience from snacks at home. While it is true that you can't get the exact recipe of popcorn at home, you also have many more options at home. You can go to the grocery and get whatever type of snack you want, whereas you are limited to a select few options at the theater.  The immersive experience of a movie theater refers to how one feels surrounded by a movie and focuses his or her attention exclusively on the film. Snacks do the opposite of that by focusing attention on taste and...

Not with a Bang but a Trickle

Not with a Bang but a Trickle The history of mass communication has inevitably become intertwined with the history of technology at large. When learning the history our lessons usually start with the advent of a new invention. Lessons have started with the metal moveable type printing press, the phonograph, and the camera. On the surface, the picture some lectures paint is that history has hinged on critical individuals and that broader social phenomenon have been propagated by the "great men" of history. This posit is based on discussions from multiple classes, but the idea came back me because of the discussions about music and sound recording technologies.  I have multiple problems with the aforementioned implications of some lectures. When our class learned about music, it all started with Thomas Edison. We learned about his phonograph, and Berliner's gramophone and then all of modern musical history as if these late 19th century inventions kickstarted an imm...