Skip to main content

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly

We Forward in this Generation

Triumphantly

A Response to Isabella Bonilla's 
"A Reflection Of the Past 72 Hours"

The past few weeks, months and years have looked bleak for the grand arc of human triumph over tribalism. From Brexit to Bolsonaro, rifts between groups of people have become evident if not enlarged. Isabella responded to a class discussion on hate crimes committed in recent days with an eloquently worded piece. (Yes I realise I have already responded to one of Isabella's posts, but they are thoughtful and not too many posts for this continuation have been made yet). In it she makes many points about the media's role in covering a tragedy. She also points out that the internet, the modern marvel it is, has a rampant problem with disinformation and promoting radicalizing echo chambers.

I agree in many regards that the internet and social media are not beneficial to the state of public discourse. I don't have any social media because I think it would be bad for my mental health, but I can imagine that scrolling through a feed of ideas you already agree with can force you further and further away from seeing the legitimacy in an opposing argument. But the internet can be used for good. The way it is now used seems to be the opposite of the intended goal. A technology meant to promote communication between different people with different ideas has instead become a self sorting algorithm that radicalizes those originally most prone to hearing arguments and changing opinions. But the internet can be and is being used in a better way. The internet has literally just about everything one could possibly know. News websites are newspapers that are constantly updated, e-mail allows us to instantly communicate with those half a world away, google is basically a genie that can tell you whatever you want to know.(and also spies on you, but you know, life is a double edged sword.) The internet has raised countless amounts of money for charities, it has public debate forums, it has it all. It is hard for us 21st century kids to imagine life without it.

Isabella also expressed that the media was largely at fault for the divisiveness of today's society. While there is no scientific method for measuring societal divisiveness, the media sure likes to promote the narrative that America is more divided than ever and that we are at the precipice of some civil war because of it. Divided is a pretty vague term, though. Isabella places much of the blame for today's political and social climate on the media promoting their own viewpoints instead of objectively covering the most newsworthy stories. She lists many seemingly at odds groups and says that "The majority of one group hates the other, and vice-versa." While I agree that racial, political and other disputes are now often too connected to identity, I sure wouldn't go as far as to say that the majority of white people hate black people or black people hate white people, because that just isn't true. I think to say that is to accept the ultimate lie pushed and propagated by some of the media, that being that most Americans hate each other. Constant stories about crime make it seem more prevalent than it is, and an abundance of stories on racism and hatred make it seem more widespread than it is. People have subconscious biases for sure, there is still everyday racism and one person calling the cops on a black person for going about their life in a completely normal manner isn't acceptable. However, most white Americans don't think their race is superior, aren't in the klan and don't hate others based on the color of their skin.

We sure don't live in a post-racial world as was suggested ten years ago from Tuesday. Racism, sexism, bigotry and general hate are still major problems in the U.S. We don't live in a perfect world or country. But we also don't live in a world where most straight people hate gay people or most democrats hate republicans. The most recent poll on the subject found that two-thirds of Americans support same-sex marriage. Another poll found that sixty-eight percent of Americans think openness to people from other nations is critical to who we are as a country. The grandest project of America is to have every group of human beings able to live here together and side by side in peace and harmony. As evidenced by this week of hatred, we sure aren't there yet. But if the majority of Americans share that view of our country, just maybe we aren't as far as we think.

Comments

  1. Thank you for the constructive criticism on my post. I have made a few small edits in order to adapt to this new information. I really appreciate it, and am always looking to be further educated on topics. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Yellow Journalism and Democracy (Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class)

Yellow Journalism and Democracy Mama Mia, here we go again with historical connections to what we learn in class Why does fake news exist? I have briefly dabbled into the topic of fake news in previous posts, but today seems like the perfect time to do a deeper dive as we talked about yellow journalism in class on Wednesday. More specifically, what happens when a news organization is willing to compromise its integrity, truth, and loyalty to the people in order to sell papers or today, ads. This year's J+C freshman class has had it drilled into our minds from day one that a journalist's first loyalty is always to the people, and for good reason. The original era of yellow journalism was born from a natural and capitalist desire of corporations to make money, and from the public's desire to be entertained. In class my classmates and I learned about yellow journalism in the context of Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst, not Rupert Murdoch or Ted Turner. But woul...

Response to "Consumption of Communication" by Isabella Bonilla

A Response to "Consumption of Mass Communication" Earlier today I had the pleasure of reading " Consumption of Mass Communication " on Isabella Bonilla's blog  "Belladora: Critique This" . Isabella makes some good points I agree with in the post. She points out that "The refusal to have exposure to opposing views creates ignorance within our reality" , and I couldn't agree more. Through out the post, she has a point that I agree with and she certainly doesn't mince her well chosen words. Isabella does make one point that I disagree with. In the final paragraph of her post she says that "(The psychological filter) can be changed at simple will, and pushed curiosity of the mind." I do not believe that the psychological filter can be easily removed, on the contrary I think that it takes extreme persistence and a changed state of mind.  I will be the first to admit, I have a psychological filter. Perhaps mine isn't as...

A General Review of WDRB

A General Review of WDRB From my time watching WDRB while doing this blog, I have mixed reviews. It isn't perfect and doesn't strictly adhere to the somewhat utopian yardsticks and guidelines, but most of its stories are relevant and from looking at the early data our class has gathered, it appears to be the best local news station we've got. WDRB has a fair mixture of populist and elitist stories. The ever-chastised sports stories are limited to only about three short stories at the last three to four minutes of each half-hour broadcast. While crime stories are sometimes a large part of the show, there are usually important stories mixed in. WDRB always has two weather stories per broadcast, which seems a reasonable number considering that weather directly affects the lives of every viewer, but time is very limited in a thirty minute broadcast with ten or so minutes of ads. I've been impressed by many of WDRB's stories on social issues and government program...