Skip to main content

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart

A response to a class discussion on recent hate crimes

 Hate is not the thing with feathers.  It is not natural, it is not innate to anyone. It is learned, which is what is most frightening about the three heinous hate crimes that rocked the U.S. in the past three days. In our own hometown a man shot and killed two black people at a Kroger in a racially motivated attack. The man that mailed pipe bombs in an attempt to assassinate a former president, a presidential nominee, a former attorney general, a billionaire and members of a news organization was captured. A man shot and killed eleven Jews in a synagogue. 

Many have come to the consensus over the past three days of hatred and gradually over the past couple of years that some newfound hatred is gripping America. It can certainly feel that way. There is evidence that hate crimes are on the rise. That is startling. Not to copy Franklin Roosevelt, but the scariest thing from this might be that fear will penetrate streets, neighborhoods, and homes. As Brazil recently showed, scared people call for drastic measures. They elected a president promising to cut down on crime, but he also has said that Brazil's brutal military dictatorship didn't kill enough people and that he wouldn't rape a congresswoman because she was too ugly. But crime floods the streets of Brazil's largest cities, America is still relatively safe. But if people feel threatened, they will take drastic actions. 

I know that I am not in a position to tout that "oh America is so safe and hate crimes are so rare!" being white, male and living in a safe neighborhood. But these past three days of hate have been brought about by the actions of three people. Three people out of a population of three hundred and twenty-some million. The actions of three people won't convince me that there is a new hatred in America. Most people in the world aren't filled with loathing for any other group of fellow humans. Most people have moral compasses. (Although I think now some people may have a magnet held up to their's). Most people are good and motivated to be so. So why now are hate crimes increasing in number across the U.S.? I don't have a great answer, no one really does. It again seems something is wrong in this great society we have built. But what peaceful time is there to harken back to when all people of America and the world lived in peace and harmony together? There has never been a time without people with radical fringe views contradictory to American values. But relegating these views to the radical few is progress.  

After the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., Robert Kennedy said "the vast majority of white people and the vast majority of black people in this country want to live together, want to improve the quality of our life, and want justice for all human being who abide in our land." His entire speech from the back of a truck in Indianapolis is relevant now. RFK was shot and killed sixty-two days after delivering that speech. 

But the 60's are remembered for the triumph of the Civil Rights Movement, the moon landing and other great societal, political and technological progress. John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy helped define that decade. Their assassins did not. The actions of three people trying to counter a world in which all peoples live together in harmony will never define the first country built on enlightenment ideals and equality. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly

We Forward in this Generation Triumphantly A Response to Isabella Bonilla's  "A Reflection Of the Past 72 Hours" The past few weeks, months and years have looked bleak for the grand arc of human triumph over tribalism. From Brexit to Bolsonaro, rifts between groups of people have become evident if not enlarged.  Isabella responded to  a class discussion on hate crimes committed in recent days with an eloquently worded piece. (Yes I realise I have already responded to one of Isabella's posts, but they are thoughtful and not too many posts for this continuation have been made yet). In it she makes many points about the media's role in covering a tragedy. She also points out that the internet, the modern marvel it is, has a rampant problem with disinformation and promoting radicalizing echo chambers. I agree in many regards that the internet and social media are not beneficial to the state of public discourse. I don't have any social media because I

In Defense of WDRB

In Defense of WDRB Local news is inherently flawed. Local news is often incapable of living up to national expectations on a low budget and local audience. Evie published a post  that had some harsh words for WDRB today. In it, she berates the local news station for airing too many stories about social issues or human interest, and for publishing too many sports stories online. The way she sees it, WDRB sacrifices being able to do in depth coverage on specific stories in exchange for more time for populist stories. While I agree with her in some points, I fundamentally disagree with her opinions on what constitutes a relevant and important story.  Evie states that on a recent broadcast "there were nine stories that fit under the category of social issues and human interests, but their were zero stories on politics and government, and only one story on accidents and disasters" to support her point that WDRB is airing too many irrelevant stories. While I do see it as s

All the Facts

All the Facts On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported.  Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why