Skip to main content

Blurring Lines

Blurring Lines

 Recently in our journalism class, we have been discussing binary models, ways to classify different forms of mass communication. What I found interesting was in the binary model classifying these methods as elitist or populist. This separates the types of communication into those that give the people what they need, that often being information, and what the people want, usually entertainment based. In class we talked about how sometimes that distinction can be fuzzy, for example Sesame Street being a show that entertains but simultaneously provides children with beneficial lessons. This made me think about an entirely different way that the line between elitist and populist communication has been blurred within the journalistic field, and that is cable news.

 Whenever I turn on my T.V. in a vain attempt to figure out what happened over the course of the day, locally, nationally or across the world, I find that there seem to be no real sources that provide objective and unbiased stories. Obviously, the two most famous culprits of only airing stories that support a pre-determined view point are MSNBC and FOX. Both draw sharp and often deserved criticism and both serve as echo chambers that "inform" those with worldviews aligning with their own. They also seem to defy the binary model between elitist and populist entertainment because they brand themselves as news organizations that provide viewers with information, but must entertain to maintain viewership and profits. The cable news channels achieve this sustainment of viewership with a twenty-four hour news blitz with headlines that inexplicably always come along with the label of breaking news. They have so-called expert panels that yell at each other to entertain and commentators and hosts hired specifically to pander to those with already extremist viewpoints. FOX, MSNBC, their affiliates and other news groups treat politics like sports, like a zero-sum game. Local news stations break many of the seven yardsticks of journalism by airing gruesome, shocking or otherwise eye-catching stories that are more often than not completely irrelevant, their motivations are certainly not those of elitist communication outlets.

 This brings us back to the binary model this post was inspired by, elitist versus populist. With cable news, the distinction between the two is increasingly blurred, and that is a problem. When a very significant chunk of the American populous has one of these news organizations that have a loyalty to money over truth and the people, where does that lead us? How can we be expected to have civil debate when we can't agree on objective truths? If the line between entertainment and news, between elitist and populist communication, is blurred beyond recognition, how is a democracy supposed to function? Can we together start to clarify the line? I can't answer these questions. Neither can you. These questions must be answered by all of us.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart

Drop by Drop Upon the Heart A response to a class discussion on recent hate crimes   Hate is not the thing with feathers.  It is not natural, it is not innate to anyone. It is learned, which is what is most frightening about the three heinous hate crimes that rocked the U.S. in the past three days. In our own hometown a man shot and killed two black people at a Kroger in a racially motivated attack. The man that mailed pipe bombs in an attempt to assassinate a former president, a presidential nominee, a former attorney general, a billionaire and members of a news organization was captured. A man shot and killed eleven Jews in a synagogue.  Many have come to the consensus over the past three days of hatred and gradually over the past couple of years that some newfound hatred is gripping America. It can certainly feel that way. There is evidence that hate crimes are on the rise. That is startling. Not to copy Franklin Roosevelt, but the scariest thing from this m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Not with a Bang but a Trickle

Not with a Bang but a Trickle The history of mass communication has inevitably become intertwined with the history of technology at large. When learning the history our lessons usually start with the advent of a new invention. Lessons have started with the metal moveable type printing press, the phonograph, and the camera. On the surface, the picture some lectures paint is that history has hinged on critical individuals and that broader social phenomenon have been propagated by the "great men" of history. This posit is based on discussions from multiple classes, but the idea came back me because of the discussions about music and sound recording technologies.  I have multiple problems with the aforementioned implications of some lectures. When our class learned about music, it all started with Thomas Edison. We learned about his phonograph, and Berliner's gramophone and then all of modern musical history as if these late 19th century inventions kickstarted an imm...
Post a Comment
Read more

All the Facts

All the Facts On the 6 o'clock news on Monday WDRB aired a story that was not well researched or well reported. There are plenty of stories like that that are aired, but this was the lead story on the 6 P.M. broadcast. All the details on the story viewers were given was that there was an incident that might have involved gunshots in an apartment complex and that the police had showed up. The reporter added that no ambulance had shown up at the time it was reported.  Not only is this a meaningless, fear-mongering story, but WDRB made it the lead story of the broadcast. They thought that a possible incident that may or may not have involved gunshots was the most important thing for Louisvillians to know. They didn't wait to air the story until they had more details than "something happened!". They aired this hollow nothingness and tried to make it have the semblance of a news story. They said they would come back to the story if they got any more details, but why...
Post a Comment
Read more